Pages

10 April 2003

A SOUNDWALK OF CUBAO, QUEZON CITY : AN ACOUSTIC SURVEY

A SOUNDWALK OF CUBAO, QUEZON CITY : AN ACOUSTIC SURVEY
BY ROBIN DANIEL Z. RIVERA
10 April 2003
SOCIOLOGY 282 - QUALITATIVE METHODS IN SOCIAL  RESEARCH
DR. CLEMEN AQUINO

OBJECTIVES
The study shall attempt to develop a qualitative study of the acoustic nature of Cubao, Quezon City. This study will use sound recordings obtained by the researcher as the primary source of the study. It will focus on sounds in which some form of communication is achieved. This includes human communication such as vocal and body  sounds, as well as non-human sounds that can be interpreted as having the ability to indicate specific events and conditions of the environment.

The diversity in the types of traffic and land use of this area is the main attraction to this researcher. And it is hypothesized that the diversity of the landscape and soundscape may provide valuable information about the different types of aural, social interaction that occurs in urban areas such as this in Quezon City. 

PROFILE OF CUBAO, QUEZON CITY
Cubao is well known as a major commercial and trasnportation hub of the Quezon City area.  Aurora Boulevard bisects the district and carries a variety of small to medium sized vehicles like automobiles, AUVs jeepneys and, to a lesser extent, heavy vehicles such as buses and trucks.  It also carries the MRT 4 overhead light rail commuter train, which while the tracks had been completed along the Cubao area, it was not yet operational at this time. South of Aurora Boulevard, the Araneta Center has been the commercial hub of this area since the 1950's. The 35-hectare property is owned and developed by the Araneta family. It houses several commercial landmarks such as the Araneta Coliseum. The Center enjoyed much success from the 1960's to the 1970's. But competing commercial centers such as the Ayala center in Makati, and the Ortigas Center in San Juan/Pasig have overtaken it in popularity and stature. In 2001, the Quezon City government and the Araneta Center jointly started the Metro Centro Quezon City Development Plan, the first phase of which concentrates on restoring competitiveness to the Center by redeveloping the commercial and civil infrastructure.

To the north of Aurora Boulevard is a predominantly middle and lower class residential area. There are a variety of house structures ranging from single detached units, to apartments, to squatter shanties. This, and other residential areas in Cubao are targets of Phase 2 and 3 of the Metro Centro Quezon City Development Plan, which will involves the developement of intermediate, personal and neighborhood commercial facilities, redevelop the road network, and relocate squatters. Since 2001, the only noticeable development in this area is the repair of some roads in the system. The western boundary of both these areas is EDSA. Previously known as the C-3 Circumferential Road, Highway 54, and Epifanio De Los Santos Avenue, EDSA is a national road that literally splits Quezon City in two. EDSA carries an even wider variety of vehicular traffic, from automobiles, to buses, to the fully operational MRT3 overhead light rail commuter train. 

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
In the Philippines, relatively little attention has been given to the study of sound in the environment. Most acoustic surveys have been aimed at controlling the acoustic characteristics of building interiors. Environmental impact studies conducted for DENR environmental compliance typically pay more attention to projected land use and and air quality before, during, and after construction. Sound and noise levels are rarely measured, and projections are limited only to the changes occurring during construction. construction. An article of the Inquirer newspaper (Salazar, 2003), quotes a recent national study by the University of the Philippines College of Public Health that focused on occupational noise exposure. It cites permissible noise exposure levels set by the Department of Labor and Employment. But the framework and the standards for both the study and the guidelines seem to be based on studies and legislation formulated by western institutions such as the Environmental Protection Agency in the U.S.A. While the study is laudable, it is one of a very few of its kind in the Philippines. Partly because of the lack of research, media coverage pertaining to environmental and occupational noise such as this is few and far between. The dearth of environmental  acoustic surveys (both quantitative and qualitative) in the Philippines has prompted this researcher to take action. This study is therefore important because it aims to stimulate the practice of conducting such surveys. The results may also be used as baseline data in exploring the relationship of the sound environment with social and cultural interaction.

RELATED LITERATURE
One of the main conceptual "schools" in the field of acoustic methods comes from the World Soundscape Project. Based in the Simon Fraiser University of Vancouver, Canada, the WSP aimed to document and codify "earwitness acounts" of sound environments around the world, and explore the theoretical understanding of listening and acoustic communication. Among its proponents are musicians R. Murray Schafer and Glenn Gould, and interdisciplinary professor Barry Truax.

One of the pivotal concepts of this school is the "soundscape". This refers to "an environment of sound (or sonic environment) with emphasis on the way it is perveived and understood by an individual or by a society" (Truax 1999). The WSP solidified the interdisciplinary framework of the study for the study of soundscapes by introducing such concepts as soundscape ecology, acoustic communication, and soundscape design.

Issues pertaining to acoustic research methods in the social sciences are also tangentially related to those of other non-text based methods such as those of  photography, moving pictures, and multimedia. Rob Walker (in Bryman and Burgess 1999, p.279-301) and Paul Henley (in Bryman and Burgess, p. 302-322) decry the relative lack of development and utilization of visual methods (and multimedia)  in qualitative research. Both imply that the use of visual data and presentations has been more associated with the physical sciences than in the social sciences. This is because the use of recording instruments such as cameras and sound recording equipment have been perceived as technological tools that are are more suited to the presentation of material data, than the "thinking" tools (such as text) that are the enlave of social scientists. This has been complimented by those in the humanities that have long developed and utilized frameworks and methods to analyze visual and acoustic works and data.

But while the social sciences have seemingly focused most of its  energies on "forcing ideas into words" (Walker, p. 280), there are still those who have managed to develop methods and strategies that use visual images to account for societies and cultures that have become increasingly visually oriented.  
Banks (2003) mentions four approaches to the use of visual data by social scientists: 1) visual records produced by the researcher, 2) visual records produced by those under study, 3) collaborative representations, and 4) and the examination of pre-existing visual representations.  

METHOD
The study will make use of a "soundwalk". A soundwalk is defined as "A form of active participation in the soundscape. Though variations are many, the essential purpose of the soundwalk is to encourage the participant to listen discriminately, and moreover, to make critical judgements about the sounds heard and their contribution to the balance or imbalance of the sonic environment." (Truax 1999, \Html Files\Soundscape.html) This method that involves the researcher walking through a particular area and collecting various sounds that occur at different times of the day. The researcher then categorizes these sounds depending on the source and/or their nature. It must be stressed that the particular version of the soundwalk used in this study will be based primarily on the sound recording. While some data will rest on the researcher's sensory experiences during the soundwalk, the primary data set will come from the recording.

The recordings made use of a MiniDisc (MD) digital sound recorder (Sony MZ-R70), and a Roland DR-181 dynamic cardioid microphone. The recording were then  copied, or “burned” to a writable Compact Disc (CD-R). 

THE ROUTE
The route is subdivided into fifteen sections, the start of each is marked by a point on the above map. The points on the map also correspond to index marks on the CD. This will enable the researcher/listener to randomly access any section of the soundwalk route on the CD.  The route is approximately three kilometers long. The soundwalk took forty-one minutes, and was done on 3 January 2003, from 11:42 am to 12:24 pm. The researcher was walking at approximately 4 kilometers per hour.

The route begins in (1) front of the east entrance to Rustan’s Superstore. It proceeds south to (2) the corner of Yale st. and Gen.McArthur st. The researcher crossed the street to the north side of Ali Mall 1, then proceeded to (3) the corner of Gen. McArthur and Timesquare streets. Walking along the front of the north side of SM Cubao, the researcher crossed the street again to the south side of Fiesta Carnival until approaching (4) Gen. McArthur corner Gen. Aguinaldo st. The route continues through to (5) the corner of Gen. McArthur and Gen. Araneta, and (6) the corner of Gen. McArthur and EDSA. Now heading north though EDSA, the route crosses (7) General Rojas, (8) Aurora Boulevard’s south-east corner, (9) Aurora Boulevard’s north-east corner, and (10) New York Avenue. Heading east on New York, the route turns south on Imperial street (11), and continues past Columbia street (12). At the end of Imperial st. the reasercher crossed Aurora boulevard and headed east (13). The route then turned south on Yale (14), crossed Gen. Malvar (15), and finally arrived back at the starting point in front of the east entrance to Rustan’s Superstore. 

SUPPORTING IMAGES
The study will generate two main supporting visual materials. These are:
1. Surface map of the surveyed area - the map contains the surveyed area, taken from the 2000 edition of the “Metro Manila Street-Map” published by National Bookstore Inc. 
2. Spectrogram of each CD track - a spectral graph, or spectrogram of each track on the cd will be created using COOLEDIT audio software. In the spectrogram used for this study, the y-axis represents audio frequencies, and the x-axis represents time. Silence is represented by darker colors (in this case, dark blue) and increasing loudness levels provokes brighter colors starting from purple, to red, to pink, to yellow, to white. The spectrograms will be presented together with the corresponding morphological discussion of each section of the route.

LIMITATIONS
One of the major limitations of the soundwalk is that the absolute loudness of the sound environment will not be measured. This requires another method known as Isobel mapping. Such mapping takes timed noise level measurements in specific points of the soundwalk, and computes the average noise level in each point. This lone researcher can not simultaneously operate the MD recorder and take readings because this needs two sets of devices, which cannot be operated by just one person.  But since the focus of the study was biased towards the quality, types, and interactions of sound objects in the environment, this empirical method was dispensed with. 

Another limitation is the microphone used. The Roland DR-181 is a typical dynamic cardioid microphone does not have a "flat" frequency response, and is less sensitive to extreme low and high frequencies than middle frequencies. Microphones capable of absolute uniform frequency response are  extremely costly, bulky, and require external power sources that compromise portability. But since the frequency response of the average human ear is also not uniform, this microphone can still capture frequencies that the human ear is most sensitive to. The  Roland microphone represents a reasonable compromise between cost and portability , with spectral uniformity. 

Another main limitation has to do with listening to the recording. Practically all natural environments have their own ambient sounds. Therefore, to listen to the recording, the researcher must effectively shut out majority, if not all of the natural ambient sound in order to hear the recording properly. This researcher has taken the following strategies. First, the listening could only be done in a relatively closed environment, like a quiet room. Second, listening was conducted at a time of day when ambient sound is at a minimum, like late at night. Third, to further isolate the recorded sound, the researcher used a closed headset system composed of 1) “ear-bud” type earphones, and 2) a closed-type noise protection headset over the earphones. Fourth, because of the unnatural nature of the listening environment, the researcher had to be conscious of the detrimental effects of listening fatigue. Each listening session could either only be one continuous playback of the whole recording, or listening of individual sections without exceeding the point at which fatigue set in. The loudness level was also controlled so as not to induce fatigue or temporary deafness. 

Despite these measures, this researcher has pinpointed some remaining sources of noise, namely 1) low level ambient sound that manages to leak into the researchers playback system, 2) system noise generated by the recording and playback devices, and 3) natural body sounds such as heartbeat, and “ringing” in the ears due to either listening fatigue or neural system hum. While these sounds may be masked by the recording, they remain a potential source of noise. But by identifying these, it is hoped that the researcher can relegate them into the background so as not to adversely affect the listening process. 


DEFINITIONS - The study will make use of several technical terms. All terms are taken from the Handbook of Acoustic Ecology, 2nd edition. CD-ROM version 1.1.

ACOUSTIC HORIZON - “The farthest distance in every direction from which sounds may be heard. Incoming sounds from distant sources define the outer limits over which acoustic communication may normally occur, and thus help to define the perceived geographical relationships between communities.

SOUND SIGNALs from one community, for instance, may penetrate others. The importance of their signalling function usually diminishes, but they also act as a reminder of the various ways in which the separate communities are related. In some communities, a change in the perceived acoustic horizon, such as when a certain bell or other distant sound is particularly noticeable, has a predictable meaning as a weather forecast. Since the definition of an acoustic horizon depends on the perception of quiet sounds, it is highly susceptible to change by SOUND INTRUSIONs and other MASKing sounds. These reduce the distance of what can be heard, a characteristic shrinkage that runs parallel to that of the acoustic profile of sound signals with the rising AMBIENT NOISE of communities (see ACOUSTIC SPACE, LO-FI). Acoustic links between communities and parts of communities are now often replaced by ELECTROACOUSTIC and media links.” (Truax 1999,\Html Files\Acoustic_Horizon.html)

AMBIENCE or AMBIANCE - “The background sound of an environment in relation to which all foreground sounds are heard, such as the 'SILENCE' of an empty room, conversation in a restaurant, or the stillness of a forest. Ambience is actually comprised of many small sounds, near and far, which generally are heard as a composite, not individually. Also called ambient noise.” (Truax 1999, \Html Files\Ambience.html)

KEYNOTES - “In SOUNDSCAPE studies, keynote sounds are those which are heard by a particular society continuously or frequently enough to form a background against which other sounds are perceived. Examples might be the sound of the sea for a maritime community or the sound of the internal combustion engine or HUMs in the modern city. Often keynote sounds are not consciously perceived, but they act as conditioning agents in the perception of other SOUND SlGNALs. They have accordingly been likened to the ground in the figure-ground relationship of visual perception. (Truax. 1999. \Html Files\Keynote.html) 

MORPHOLOGY - The study of forms and structures. Originally employed in biology it was later (by 1869) employed in philology to refer to patterns of inflection and word formation. Applied to SOUNDSCAPE studies, it refers to changes in groups of sounds with similar forms or functions when considered historically or geographically. (Truax 1999, \Html Files\Morphology.html)

MASK OR MASKING - “The effect one sound has on another by making it harder or impossible to hear. Masking will also occur for a few milliseconds before and after the desired sound, these phenomena being termed forward and backward masking respectively.” (Truax 1999, \Html Files\Mask.html)

NOISE - “Etymologically the word can be traced back to Old French (noyse) and to 11th century Provençal (noysa, nosa, nausa), but its origin is uncertain. It has a variety of meanings and shadings of meaning, the most important of which are the following:
1. Unwanted sound: The Oxford English Dictionary contains references to noise as unwanted SOUND dating back as far as 1225. 
2. Unmusical sound: The 19th century physicist Hermann von Helmholtz employed the term 'noise' to describe sound composed of non-PERIODIC vibrations (e.g. the rustling of leaves), by comparison with musical sounds, which consist of periodic vibrations. Noise is still used in this sense in expressions such as BROAD BAND NOISE, GAUSSIAN NOISE, NARROW BAND NOISE, RANDOM NOISE, RUSTLE NOISE or WHITE NOISE.
3. Any loud sound: In general usage today, noise often refers to particularly loud sounds. In this sense a noise abatement by-law prohibits certain loud sounds or establishes their permissible limits in DECIBELs. See: JET PAUSE, LOUDNESS, NOISE POLLUTION, SOUND INTRUSION, SOUND POLLUTION.
4. Disturbance in any COMMUNICATION system: In electronics and engineering, noise refers to any disturbances which do not represent part of the SIGNAL, such as static on a telephone or 'snow' on a television screen. See: BACKGROUND NOISE, SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO. Compare: REDUNDANCY.
The most satisfactory definition of noise for general use is still 'unwanted sound'. This makes noise a subjective term: one person's music may be another's noise. But it also provides the opportunity for a society to come to a general agreement as to which sounds constitute unwanted intrusions.” (Truax 1999, \Html Files\Noise.html)

SOUNDMARK - “A term derived from 'landmark' used in SOUNDSCAPE studies to refer to a community sound which is unique, or possesses qualities which make it specially regarded or noticed by the people in that community. Soundmarks, therefore, are of cultural and historical significance and merit preservation and protection.” (Truax 1999. \Html Files\Soundmark.html)

SOUNDSCAPE - “An environment of SOUND (or sonic environment) with emphasis on the way it is perceived and understood by the individual, or by a society. It thus depends on the relationship between the individual and any such environment. The term may refer to actual environments, or to abstract constructions such as musical compositions and tape montages, particularly when considered as an artificial environment.” (Truax 1999, \Html Files\Soundscape.html)

TYPOLOGY- The classification of sounds according to form and function. For instance, sounds may be classified according to their origin (natural, human, man-made), their function in the SOUNDSCAPE (e.g., SOUND SIGNAL, KEYNOTE, SOUNDMARK), or their context (for instance, with speech sounds, the contexts of interview, story-telling, conversation, recitation, etc.). (Truax 1999, \Html Files\Typology.html)


FINDINGS

The findings will be divided into two main parts. The first, typological section, will classify and discuss the types of sounds in the recording according to forms and functions. The second, morphological section will discuss the relations of the various sounds, both within a specific area of the route, as well as from one area to the next. 

TYPOLOGY 

VOCAL COMMUNICATION
In most cases, human vocal sounds carry specific communicative purpose or intent. The recording, for example contains several instances of such communication. One type is short-range conversation. Because of the intimate nature of such communication, these sounds have a relatively short acoustic horizon. While the recording did manage to pick up quite a number of conversations, it was hard to make out exactly what people were actually saying. This could be because the recording, as well as the people conversing, were moving towards, then away from each other. There is therefore no way of determining the context of the conversation that had been happening over a long period of time. Also, keynote sounds tend to mask the some phonetic sounds, mostly consonants. Another observation about most of the  conversations in the recording is that they come in brief sentences and phrases. In only a few cases were there recorded conversations spoken in a long stream. 

On the other hand, another type of human communication are “broadcast” messages. Some examples of these are “barker” calls at jeepney and bus stops, and street vendor calls. These are quite different from interpersonal conversation. First, these broadcast messages are not aimed at specific persons, and must have a farther acoustic horizon.  This creates a type of voice that can be described as more shrill and nasal than short-range conversation. This allows the sound to counteract the masking effects of keynote sounds. Such broadcast messages are delivered in either short bursts, or  rhythmic patterns. This could be in order to create redundancy, and ensure comprehension. The ironic thing about broadcast messages is that sometimes, the performance associated with such messages sometimes become “stylized”. In order to call the attention of potential clients, the barker uses such a distinctive way of talking that the words become obscured. While the barker manages to call attention, it is not always clear what the content of the message is. 

In between the two were long-range interpersonal communication. The type of voice used in these resembled broadcast messages. The exchange of such communication is usually short bursts of words and phrases like broadcast messages. This is most likely due to the fact that this mode is merely used to call the attention of the target receiver, and is finished once the individuals approach each other.
Each of these types of natural human vocal communication is subject to masking. Short-range conversation is the most prone to this effect. One can only speculate how many vocal sounds were masked in the recording.  But the recording equipment does not selectively discriminate sounds like the human hearing system. So any masking would be caused by physical factors, and not psychological ones. 

In addition to natural vocal sounds, there are amplified vocal sounds as well. These are present specially when keynote sounds are relatively loud. In most cases, the amplification adds not only loudness, but considerable distortion as well. 

MECHANICAL, ELECTRO-ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION
There are a number of mechanical, electrical, and electronic sounds that could be considered communicative in nature. These usually stand out from keynote sounds, but are not fixed to any one position like sound marks. 

One ubiquitous example is the automotive horn. In most cases, horns are used as devices to signal the coming of, or presence of a vehicle. This is important, specially for public utility vehicles, because it alerts potential commuters/customers to the availability of space. The loudest sound in the entire recording comes from a bus that blew its horn within a few meters of the microphone (see track 6, EDSA corner Gen. McArthur). It is hard to image how something that loud could  escape anyone’s attention. There are an endless variety of horns. They vary in pitch, timbre, and in the number of simultaneous tones. One-tone and two-tone horns are the most common. There are also two types based on function. The first type is the electro-mechanical type that is similar in design to an audio speaker. These are usually high-pitched and have a relatively shrill timbre. The sound also comes on and off rather abruptly. The other type is the air-horn, which uses compressed air, and is similar in function to a musical wind instrument such as, literally, a horn or trumpet. The sound builds up and dies out more slowly than its electric counterpart, but has a richer and more brassy timbre. While this is usually associated with larger vehicles such as buses, some jeepneys have smaller versions of them. 
Sirens are another device that are capable of rising above the keynote. For example, from track 5 to 7, the siren, or wang-wang from a police motorcycle or haggad can be heard almost continuously. Legally, sirens are reserved for vehicles belonging to either law enforcement entities, emergency ambulance services, or high government employees. These are used to alert others on the street to give way because of either an emergency situation, or the authority of the passenger. But on the street, this is not always true. There are sirens coming from vehicles that do not fit either of these categories. Such sirens are not as loud as the one from the haggad, but can still be called sirens because of the melodic nature of the sound. One example comes from jeepneys. The sound is more like whistling because they lack lower frequencies, and are not as robustly loud as “legitimate” sirens. But these, in addition to horns, are another signal to commuters of the arrival of a jeepney.

Finally, various forms of recorded music and voice can be heard throughout the route. One essential function, specially in the commercial areas, is to call public attention to commercial activity. For example, some stalls and vendors along the route were selling music recordings such as CDs, cassettes, and VCD’s. So the stores and vendors would play sample of the merchandise.  In other cases, the merchandise was not music-related, so the function was akin to merely creating commotion in order to call attention. In other cases, music was played to provide some sort of entertainment. While this may be obvious for music being played in the residential area of the route, this may also account for why it occurs among stores and vendors selling non-music-related products. 


SOUNDMARKS
Truax’s definition of soundmarks refer to sounds that are recognized to have some historical significance to the community, and stimulate some kind of preservation efforts.  While this is not within the immediate scope of this study, the concept can be extended to include sounds in a relatively fixed geographic position, that provide functional signals to the community. 

A prime example of this type of sound is the jeepney barker. These people are usually semi-permantently situated in major jeepney stops where there is a high level of human traffic. They are valuable to jeepney drivers because they stimulate and control the influx of passengers. They also control the timing of the deployment of jeepneys along route. They may also serve as message centers between drivers, and for the driver/operators association. They are so valued that each driver pays the barker a fee, either proportionate to the number of passengers that embark, or fixed by an association of drivers and operators in the route. They are also important to the passengers because they are guided to the correct jeepney without having to visually search for the route signs within otherwise elaborate artwork. They also provide instant information on the remaining number of available seating places in the jeepney. The relatively fixed location of the barker, and the rich set of information provided in an aural form qualifies this as a soundmark in busy urban streets. 

Another possible soundmark, specially along EDSA is the sound of the MRT train. These trains are programmed to arrive at regular intervals, and could potentially provide information on the passage of time. They are also highly audible amidst the urban keynote, so it is difficult to miss their arrival. 


MORPHOLOGY

TRACK 1: (Southbound From The Front Of The East Entrance To Rustan’s Superstore along Yale street.)
The track commences with the researcher’s identification of location, date and time. The most prominent feature of the track is the intermittent passing of motor vehicles. These are articulated both by engine noise, and horns. This street is a main jeepney route. The timbres of vehicles vary widely. Some engines sound smooth, like if one pronounced the sound “SHHHHHHHHHH......”. Other engines sound course, like a long Hispanic rolled “r” . There is even the unique sound of diesel engines at idle, which sound like a rhythmic “TAKATAKATAK....”. There are a few fixed pitch and melodic horns, and one short wang-wang siren. Most of the vehicles are moving. This is probably due to the absence of a jeepney stop. The “legitimate” jeepney stop is a few hundred meters away, in front of the east entrance of Ali Mall. Less conspicuous are a few instances of human conversations. These are partly masked by vehicular and the keynote sounds.  The keynote sounds are present but not dominant, and seem to be quite distant. Finally, a slight reverberation can be heard. This is due to the fact that the sidewalk is covered on one side and the top of the building. So sound is bouncing off these hard surfaces.

TRACK 2: (Westbound from the corner of Yale st. and Gen.McArthur st. along the north side of AliMall 1.)
The main difference between this and the preceeding track is that there is relatively less discrete vehicular noises. This is because there is no jeepney route in the street. Engine and sounds are smoother, and there are less horn sounds. Human conversations are more audible, but the content is still not clear. Footsteps are occasionally audible. Like track 1, there is also a slight reverberation because the area is bounded by the overhanging roof and side walls of the building. The keynote sound is relatively similar to track 1. 

TRACK 3: (the corner of Gen. McArthur and Timesquare streets. Walking along the front of the north side of SM Cubao, the researcher crossed the street again to the south side of Fiesta Carnival)
This section of the route is slightly different from the previous section. The Keynote sound is more audible. Human conversation is also slightly more audible. This is probably because there is a greater number of people walking in the area. There are also more discrete motor vehicle sounds. One unique and clear sound was a bell from what is normally associated with itinerant Ice Cream vendors. The area has less reverberation because there was now no roof on which sounds could reflect. This resulted in increased detail of the sounds, but diminished the overall loudness. 

TRACK 4: (Westbound along Gen. McArthur from the corner of Gen. Aguinaldo st.)
This section had more discrete motor vehicle sounds and horns that the previous section. There was a similar amount, detail and loudness of human conversation. There was one feint and distant instance of recorded music. Reverberation is no longer detectable because the area could be described as a “free-field” with no surrounding hard boundaries except the pavement on the ground. 

TRACK 5: (Westbound along Gen. McArthur from the corner of Gen. Araneta)
The track starts with motor vehicles accelerating and decelerating. But this becomes more intermittent along the route. There is a major transition from a free-field environment to an semi-enclosed one, as this is now the side of the dry goods palenke section of the Farmers market. Human conversation was unusually clear, and discrete words could be understood. There is a slight tinge of reverberation, but this does not affect the clarity of the words. There was also more instances of recorded music. Keynote sounds were the same as the previous section, but for the first time, the sound of the MRT train could be heard. Also audible towards the end of the track was a wang-wang siren coming from a police motorcycle.

TRACK 6: (Starting from he corner of Gen. McArthur, heading north along EDSA.)
This track features a sudden and startling transition. First, the keynote sound increases dramatically. In addition to previous mechanical sounds coming from light and medium sized vehicles, buses have become prominent. The sound spectra of buses are relatively lower, and horns are louder with more complex timbres. Recorded music now also has a tinge of distortion due to greater loudness. Vocal sounds are also different. Those that can cut through the complexity of keynote sounds are higher pitched and seem more nasal. Ampified vocal sounds also make their debut in this section. Whatever other vocal sounds are there seem to sink into the keynote sound given their lack of high frequency content and loudness. The motorcycle police siren, which began in the previous section, has now become dominant. The siren seems to moving intermittently, but still remains dominant. As it moves farther, more reverberation is observable. This is because the area is now enclosed by the overhanging ceiling of the bus stop of Farmers Plaza, and the MRT track structure. 

TRACK 7: (Northbound along EDSA crossing General Rojas st.)
This section begins much like the previous section. But halfway through, there is a significant transition from an enclosed field to a slightly free-field. This is because the only reflective boundary that remains by the end is the MRT track structure. Heavy vehicles sounds now mix with lighter vehicles. Human voices also begin to re-emerge, be they natural or amplified. One dominant amplified voice was a jeepney barker for the Balibago-Santa Rosa-Luguna route. 

TRACK 8:(South-east corner of EDSA and Aurora Boulevard.)
There is now also a clear mix of motor and horn sounds of heavy vehicles such as buses, and medium vehicles such as jeepneys. This track opens with bus conductors calling passengers for the Monumento route, and a jeepney barker calling out for the Sta.Lucia route. These vehicles alternate between acceleration and idling. Conversation disappears and long-range vocal communication dominates. The area is practically a free-field, and the little reverberant sounds that do exist seem to be coming from a distance. 

TRACK 9: (North-east corner of EDSA and Aurora Boulevard.)
This long section carries subtle but significant transitions. The vehicular sounds begin with vigorous acceleration and deceleration, and/or stable cruising speed. But the calling of bus conductors and jeepney barkers are significantly less. Eventually, some short and long range conversations that can be heard above keynote sounds are revealed. 

TRACK 10:(Eastbound on New York st.)
This track contains another major transition in overall ambience. Gone are the sounds of large vehicles from EDSA. The keynote is reduced drastically as one goes deeper into what is primarily a residential area. The dominant vehicular sound is not the tricycle. The basic sounds of these small-displacement, two-stroke motorcycle engines can be described as high-pitched, steady sputtering. Their brakes make an even higher- pitched squealing sound. There are only occasional jeeps, and light vehicles. 

TRACK 11: (Southbound along Imperial St from New York to Columbia sts.)
Aside from the intermittent sounds of tricycles and light vehicles, this is probably the quietest section of the route. The keynote sound is at its lowest. One can now hear voice sounds clearly, in spite of the fact that most are emanating from inside houses. Sounds associated with domestic work also abound. There are occasional instances of long-range vocal communication, the clearest being those from children and dogs. 

TRACK 12: (Southbound along Imperial St from Columbia st. to Aurora Blvd.)
This section features a gradual but definite transition from the keynote-free residential area to the keynote-rich commercial district. Jeepneys, some buses, short and long-range conversation reassert themselves from the middle of the route onwards. The structural environment also changes. Aurora Blvd is enclosed by the MRT 4 track structure, and multi-story commercial buildings along the north side of the street. 

TRACK 13: (Eastbound along Aurora Blvd. to Yale st.)
The track opens with the sound of loud and distorted recorded music and voices. It continues with intermittent motorized vehicles and horns, short and long range human conversations, and a significant keynote sound. The environment is highly reverberant, owing to the many hard structural boundaries along Aurora Blvd.

TRACK 14: (South bound along Yale Street from Aurora Blvd to Gen. Malvar st.)
In this section, keynote sounds fades away slightly as one goes farther from Aurora Blvd. Reverberation also diminishes as the environment becomes a relatively free-field. There is one source of recorded music at the start which is relatively clear , with only slight distortion. Jeepneys become the dominant motorized vehicle sound since this is a main jeepney route. 

TRACK 15: (South bound along Yale Street Gen. Malvar st. to the east entrance of Rustan’s Superstore)
Various short and long-range human conversation makes a final comeback at the start of this section. One can also hear human footsteps. Intermittent jeepney sounds remain, as does recorded music, albeit at lower loudness levels. 

TRACK 16: (Return to starting point: The Front Of The East Entrance To Rustan’s Superstore along Yale street.)
In this final track, the researcher identifies the time of the completion of the sound walk. 

CONCLUSIONS
The urban landscape is also referred to as a “concrete jungle” because of the dominance of pavement over soil. In a sense, the urban soundscape is similar. One might argue that urbanization has forces out not only the presence of nature, but the sounds as well. For example, it may be difficult to find birds in the middle of the Cubao MRT station, but if there are any at all there,  it would be even more difficult to hear them. But urbanization is not a one-dimensional, homogeneous construct. This study shows that there are not only numerous audible components in an urban soundscape, but a number of combinations of these components, brought about by such variables as land use, architectural structures, human  and vehicular traffic, commercial activity, and residency. 

The study has also revealed how people have adapted to the soundscape in order to maintain the ability to communicate. Two main strategies are revealed here. What has become the more predictable strategy is to “fight fire with fire”, people using machines to rise above the noise produced by machines. Public address systems and other playback systems are used to stand out of a soundscape cluttered with the sound of motorized vehicles.  While this strategy may work, problems may ensue. The uncontrolled escalation of mechanical and electronic sound leads to numbness and insensitivity, and in extreme cases rejection and avoidance. This true for amplified, recorded music. In some cases, loud music may attract the curious. But in time, the endless, distorted nature of the sound may result in repelling potential customers. In the start of the CD’s track 13, for example, the loud recorded music did not attract any onlookers, and even served as a deterrent to the few people passing through the store. The same is true for track 14 which featured a tent selling pirated CD and VCD discs. It attracted little attention, and people seemed to want to rush through the place because the music was too loud. The use of amplified music and sound may have become ubiquitous in commercial areas, but its effectivity in promoting sales, by itself, may be considered suspect . Amplified human communication is a different story altogether. Such form usually came in rhythmic but intermittent bursts, with rests in between. This allows the listener to intermittently recover from the high loudness, and resist rejection brought about by monotony. The amplified jeepney barker in track 7 contains just enough melodic, and rhythmic variety to prevent it from becoming unduly overbearing. 

But long distance, vocal communication has provided a pleasant surprise. It is remarkable that this is still at all practised. The oppression of the predominantly mechanical keynote, and the lure of electronic amplification has not dimmed the use of, the need for, or the variety of vocal stylings by jeepney barkers and bus conductors (on track 8), and itinerant  vendors. This seems to have become a thriving, distinct feature of the Philippine urban soundscape.  This is a field that should warrant further research. 

On the other end of Cubao, the soundscape of the residential area reveals a type of “openness”. The fact that domestic sounds can be heard clearly from the middle of the street implies a number of things. First, it means that the houses are acoustically transparent, with few barriers to control external sound going in, or internal sounds going out. Second, it could also mean that the houses are very close to the street. This would probably not be the case in more affluent neighborhoods where lots are larger, houses can be situated farther from the street, and structures posses more rigid, insulating walls. 

Another major observation from the residential area is how the keynote gradually diminishes until the center of the area where it all but disappears. This is surprising considering the fact that the Araneta Center is only about one kilometer away. The acoustic horizon of the mechanically induced keynote would therefore seems rather small. This is ironic considering that the keynote by itself tends to reduce the acoustic horizon of all sounds within itself. But this is heartening because it proves that the urban soundscape does contain areas wherein relative quiet is possible, within a relatively short distance from commercial areas.

The soundscape of Cubao is unique in a number of ways. But it does provide possible clues for the soundscapes of other areas. Probably the most important generalization that can be drawn from this is that people have somehow managed to  formulate a variety of viable forms of short and long range communication that can deal with the problems of the uncontrolled escalation of electro-mechanical noises. Whether these forms are instinctive or designed, they are thriving and are seemingly evolving. But it is difficult to speculate how long such forms can continue to sidestep the powers of technology. Efforts must be taken to contain, if not control noise levels in public space. Acoustic loudness levels and horizons may not be at their peak yet, but the nature of technological development may result in unimaginable levels in the future. One can only hope that development and re-development plans for places like Cubao take the soundscape into consideration, by encouraging the same rich variety of human communicative forms, but control the dangers brought along by uncontrolled technological escalation. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Books and Articles

Berger, John. Ways Of Seeing. London, England: Penguin Books and The British Broadcasting Corporation, 1972. 

Henley, Paul. "Film Making and Ethnographic Research". In Bryman and Burgess, Qualitative Research vol. 1. London, England: Sage Publications,. 1999. 

Schafer, R. Murray. The New Soundscape. Ontario: Berandol Music Limited, 1969.

Truax, Barry. Acoustic Communication, 2nd edition. Westport, Connecticut: Ablex Publishing, 2001.

Walker, Rob. "Finding a Silent Voice for the Researcher: Using Photographs in Evaluation and Research". In Bryman and Burgess, Qualitative Research vol. 1.London, England: Sage Publications, 1999. 


Electronic Documents:

Arceo-Dumlao, Tina. “Cubao area to be born again, says Quezon City officials”. www.inq7.com, 22 December 2001. (7 April 2003)

Truax, Barry. Handbook of Acoustic Ecology, 2nd edition. CD-ROM version 1.1.  Cambridge Street Publishing, 1999. 

Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Management Bureau. Balancing Business Environment: EIS Systems for Earth-Friendly Projects. CD-ROM. ProProjex Inc., Quezon City, Philippines,  1999. 

Banks, Marcus. "Visual Research Methods". Sociology at Surrey, issue 11, (13 January 2003).

Salazar, Tessa R. “Noisy Workplace: A Problem No One Hears”. inq7.net, 19:05, 10 Jan  2003,

Department of Environment and Natural Resources. DENR ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2000-81, Series of 2000. "Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999."


_______. “Coliseum History” www.aranetacoliseum.com.  (8 April 2003)


Maps

National Book Store Inc. and Heinrich Engeler. Metro Manila Street-Map. Philippines: National Book Store Inc., 2000.  

30 August 2002

You Can’t Fool All The People All The Time: Why Computer Music Instruments Don’t Make Music Like Acoustic Music Instruments

You Can’t Fool All The People All The Time: Why Computer Music Instruments Don’t Make Music Like Acoustic Music Instruments
Robin Daniel Z. Rivera
Socio 297: Technology and Society
Fr. Tagura
30 August 2002

The debate about artificial intelligence has brought out fundamental questions about what actually constitutes human intelligence, and if this can be replicated by computers. A similar debate can be made about the difference between acoustic and computer music instruments. This paper will attempt to apply the binary nature of the argument to the problem of why virtual computer music instruments are theoretically opposed to natural acoustic musical instruments.

Herbert Dreyfuss is a long time critic of the philosophical basis for artificial intelligence (AI). Much of his criticisms are aimed at what is now called Good Old Fashioned Artificial Intelligence or GOFAI. Ron Barnett describes Dreyfuss’ critique:

“In a tone of almost "I told you so---but why won't it go away?!," Dreyfus tries to lay to final rest the AI approach dubbed by John Haugeland (1985) 'Good Old Fashioned Artificial Intelligence,' or GOFAI. Inspired by a Turing model of intelligent behavior as essentially computational, the thesis of GOFAI is that the processes underlying intelligence are symbolic in nature. More specifically: GOFAI models human intelligence as von Neumann computational architectures that (1) perform computations on abstract symbolic representations, (2) by computations governed by a stored program that contains an explicit list of instructions or rules which transform these symbolic representations into new symbolic states, and (3) in terms of which these computations are performed in serial fashion by a CPU that has information stored in the computers' permanent memory. As such, GOFAI depicts mentality within the context of what philosophers know as the Representational Theory of Mind, according to which the mind is an entity which performs calculations over mental representations, or inner tokens or symbols which refer to features of the outer world. In short, the mind is thus viewed as a symbolic information-processing device, operating in a serial fashion, and governed by rules which are, at base, the language of thought.”(1)

A simple example of a GOFAI isa linear process in which 1) knowledge is reduced to matter in the form of information, 2) information is inputted and stored into to the computer, 3) information is invoked in response to a query for appropriate action, 4) the computer will scan the database of information for an appropriate action based on existing information, 5) the selected action will be carried out by the computer to a connected controlled device, or relayed to the user. More recent types of AI such as Fuzzy Logic (FL) attempts to to incorporate vagueness into the process by deliberately obscuring the precision of both inputted information, the resulting response to queries using this information, and the resulting action. But the model of FL remains serial in nature, and still cannot simulate the essentially non-linear nature of human thought. Dreyfus critiques even more recent AI models such as Parallel Distributed Processing (PDP), or Connectionist, architectures and programming because it still lacks many human variables such as context and relevance. But Dreyfus’ nevertheless argues that intelligence is not just a function of the brain, but of a host of other components that make up the human body, the wealth of an individual’s human experience, and an infinite number of relationships that occur in the interaction of these components and experiences. Dreyfus leans toward a phenomenological take on intelligence, bordering on the metaphysical, that not only basically defies quantification, and suggests that until computers can never be capable of true intelligence as long as rationality remains tied down to positivist empiricism.

The same argument can be applied to the difference between acoustic and computer musical instruments. The basic philosophies in these two types of devices emerge from opposite sides of the spectrum, and despite efforts to forge a compromise, this remains elusive.

One root concept in virtual computer music instruments is the representation of sound as waves of air pressure. This representation was applied not just to CMI’s, but to electro-mechanical, and analog electronic musical instruments as well. But CMI’s take this one step further because the characteristics of the system that creates the sound can be stored in digital memory and called up at any given time. This kind of predictability is one of the virtues of computer control. A single “natural” sound can be dissected and a CMI can simulate or replicate the waveform. The strategy is similar to that of artificial intelligence in that a finite number of sound objects, and all their empirical characteristics are collected to form a database that will determine the range of possible outcomes. There are three popular methods for creating sounds in CMIs, these are Subtractive Synthesis, Additive Synthesis, and Sampling.

In subtractive synthesis, a digital oscillator produces a complex but periodic waveform. The waveform is then subjected to various forms of filtering to until it is deemed usable. The filtering comes in many forms. For example, Timbre (or harmonic content) envelope (or time-related characteristics), or modulation (vibrato) can be manipulated.

Additive synthesis, on the other hand, combines simple (but still periodic) waveforms to obtain complex waveforms. While these waveforms can be further subjected to the filtering techniques similar to subtractive synthesis, the process remains opposed because the sound is a product of the interaction between simple waveforms.

Sampling differs from the two because it begins with a digital recording, or “sample” of a natural sound and not from an oscillator giving off periodic waveforms. Like the other two methods, filtering can also be applied to modify its content. But unlike them, the waveform and be literally “redrawn” into a different waveform.

Whatever method of generation or filtering is used, the basic waveform is always the same. A square wave from a subtractive synthesis digital oscillator will always be the same every time is is invoked. A complex wave from an additive synthesis algorhythm will always be the same when invoked. And a sample, when invoked, will always be the same because it is a recording of a single sound event. Each digitally generated sound is a result of a finite database of waveform information. While such waveforms can be manipulated before, during, and even after performance (in the case of recorded musical performances), the possible variations are inherently limited by the nature of the “basic” waveform. In addition to this, CMI’s can be activated by computer sequencers, which store waveform and performance information in computer memory, and can invoke a stored performance identically, as often as needed. This gives CMI and computer sequencer users a great deal of certainty whenever a musical performance is invoked.

Acoustic instruments and sounds come to us from an entirely different lifeworld. It is safe to say that in nature, each individual sound is unique and cannot be repeated, regardless of the source of the sound. This can also be true for the sounds from natural, physical musical instruments. This is because acoustic musical instruments are subject to a completely different set of variables from CMIs. For example, one particular note in an instrument like a acoustic piano, played in apparently the same manner, can never duplicate the exact same sound twice. This is because, among other, the natural environment is always changing, thus affecting the sound as well as the characteristics of the material of the instrument. This is unlike a virtual environment that can controlled and or replicated. Second, the sound of acoustic instruments are usually activated by a human user, and humans are not theoretically known for precise repetition. Human musicians usually approach a level of repetitive precision by regular and intense practice. But no matter how consistent a musician may be, a performance always has an air of uncertainty. CMI’s, on the other hand, can be called to precisely replicate the activation of a waveform ad nauseum. The list of variables goes on and on. So every sound in a natural environment is based on a unique phenomenon with an infinite number of physical variables, the inherent uniqueness of every human action in the activation of the instrument, and an overall sense of uncertainty that preceeds the production of a sound.

Each and every natural sound from an acoustic musical instrument is unique, despite human attempts to make them consistent. While musical virtuosos are valued for their consistency, they are also treasured for their ability to come up with new sounds that defy sameness. This shows the ironic nature of acoustic instruments, sound, and performances. In turn, each sound in a CMI is born from a single instance of a waveform, in spite of massive efforts to create variations. Digital instruments remove at least one important variable in this ability because the root sound is just a repetition of a previously synthesized or sampled sound, and the effort needed to vary a sound is bound by a finite database of variables. While acoustic instruments thrive on uncertainty, virtual CMIs sounds boasts of unhuman consistency and predictability.

Just as the Turing Test attempted to fool some respondents into thinking that they were conversing with a human instead of a computer, CMI’s have managed to fool some listeners into thinking that they were listening to an acoustic instrument. But as the saying goes, you can’t fool all the people all of the time. I will not be as bold as Dreyfus by saying that CMI’s will never possess all the characteristics of acoustic instruments. But until a new computer algorhythm is devised to produce virtual sound in the same model as acoustic instruments, the binary nature of this argument will remain.

Footnote

(1)Ron Barnette.”A Critical Review of What Computers Still Can't Do, by Hubert Dreyfus”. <http://www.valdosta.edu/~rbarnett/phi/dreyfus.html> (20 August 2002, 22:45 PST).


Sources

Barnette, Ron. “A Critical Review of What Computers Still Can't Do, by Hubert Dreyfus ”. (20 August 2002, 22:45 PST).

Dreyfus, Herbert; Dreyfus, Stuart. “From Socrates to Expert Systems:The Limits and Dangers of Calculative Rationality”. (20 August 21:30 PST).

Truax, Barry. Acoustic Communication, 2nd edition. Westport, Connecticut: Ablex Publishing, 2001.


1Ron Barnette.”A Critical Review of What Computers Still Can't Do, by Hubert Dreyfus”. <http://www.valdosta.edu/~rbarnett/phi/dreyfus.html> (20 August 2002, 22:45 PST).

12 April 2002

NOISE 2: EXPLORING NOISE AND NOISE, INGAY AND INGAY

NOISE 2: EXPLORING NOISE AND NOISE, INGAY AND INGAY
Robin Daniel Z. Rivera
12 April 2002
Sociology 297
Fr. Pablito M. Tagura

The first paper in this series discussed the various definitions of noise and issues related to these definitions. This second paper will apply two philosophical projects using the issues raised previously. These are 1)Walter Ong’s discussion of orality and literacy, and 2) the counter-narrative to the prevailing use of the word noise. Another goal is to explore and articulate a number of popular attitudes and perceptions that the writer has met along the way in the study of noise. One such dominant attitude that has continuously bothered this writer is that noise is unwanted and destructive, and carries with it a automatically negative connotation. While the previous paper revealed certain passive contexts such as in physical science, empirical knowledge in this field is still used as a weapon to cast noise as a generally destructive entity. This paper will search for other reasons and arguments for issues and contexts such as these.

In this paper, the italicized noise and ingay refer to the specific words, and the un-italicized “noise” refers to the concept or phenomenon.

ETYMOLOGY - ORALITY VERSUS LITERACY
The words used for noise in the English and Filipino languages reveals certain differences within, and between each cultures’ mind set about the phenomenon. The first project that comes to mind is Walter Ong's(1) work on Orality and Literacy. This attempts to distinguish between cultures that are primarily aural versus those that are primarily textual. While a culture might shift from one type to another, Ong  manages to "freeze" each type so that the characteristics might be fully laid out and observed. This presents a potential clue to the context of the terms used to refer to noise. Both the English and Filipino languages have an extensive repertoire of words for noise. But each language has a different proportion of designative versus descriptive terms. This raises the question of the origin of words, and the orientation of the language. 

Onomatopoeia and Orality
The most noticeable things about various dictionary entries for either noise or ingay in contemporary Filipino dictionaries (either English-Filipino and Filipino-Filipino) is that one can be besieged by an avalanche of onomatopoeic terms. This is clearly not the case in all-English dictionaries. Gaboy(2) lists, among others, the following onomatopoeic terms for noise

Noise - n. - ingay, kaingayan, ngasngas, ngawngaw, kiyaw-kiyaw, ngakngak, pambubuliglig, bulahaw, pambubulabog, pangngingimbal, lagislis, laginit, ingit, hugong, ugong, lagunlon, dalagdal, dalugdog, kalantong, kalantog, pagkupkop, uko (ingay ng kalapati)

The wealth of such onomatopoeic terms for noises suggests that Filipino is a language still biased towards sound and orality. That these words are based on a spoken imitation of a specific sound makes it easy tosuspect it springs from an oral culture.

Oral cultures are held to operate using mnemonic patterns, and parallel closely the occurrence of phenomena in the "human life world". Onomatopoeia operationalizes  this by creating words based on the vocal imitation of actual sounds. This uncanny connection fulfills most of the characteristics of orality set down by Ong. For example, onomatopoeic words refer closely to the "human life world" because of their imitative nature. Then, it enhances memorability because it is, in a sense, redundant of the original phenomenon. Finally, onomatopoeia is also expressive and situational, as opposed to analytical and abstract. All of these strengthen the argument that onomatopoeia is a characteristic of a primarily oral culture. 

Transition: Some Strange Ironies
Another noticeable thing about the onomatopoeic terms for noise is that they seem to posses a remarkably high level of descriptive precision because of their mimetic nature. But precision is tricky, it  may apply to one word but not to a language in general. For example, because of the lack of an exact equivalent word, ugong can only be described in English a low frequency droning sound. A question arises when one wonders if ugong and ingay actually share the same conceptual definition. The closest English equivalent of ugong would be either rumble or hum. But rumble and hum, at least in English dictionaries, are not necessarily synonymous with noise. English definitions for noise tend to be  more conceptual than descriptive. So although some Filipino words may have more descriptively precise words in its arsenal for certain types of sounds than in English, the English culture may seem to have more precision in articulating the dimensions of abstract concepts such as noise. This leads to the clash between contexts of noise. 

Designative Terms and Literacy
As is the case of the dominant English term noise, the generic Filipino word ingay can be hypothesized to emerge from a more literate, abstract, and designative language framework. The word has no derivative sonic equivalent in the human life world. And they can be argued to emerge from the designative, textual, and abstract nature of the present day English language. Such abstraction leads to a number of contexts. The previous paper presented four contexts within noise was defined, these were 1)physical science, 2)communication, 3) environmental policy and 4) art aesthetics. Does ingay exist in these contexts, or does it have others? 

CONTEXT - WORD

Aural - descriptive: ngasngas, ngawngaw, kiyaw-kiyaw, ngakngak, pambubulabog, lagislis, laginit, ingit, hugong, ugong, lagunlon, dalagdal, dalugdog, kalantong, kalantog, uko (ingay ng kalapati)

Aural - designative: ingay, tunog, lingal, linggal

Disorder: gulo, panggugulo, iskandalo, komosyon

Interference: istorbo sa tunog ng radyo

Aggression: pagkupkop

Based on contemporary dictionary entries, the above context categories emerge. One may observe that since some of the these sources are trans-language dictionaries, the entries contain synonyms rather than “definitive statements”. Interestingly, the above terms include a fair number of non-aural related terms, like the category of Physical/Social Disorder. While English dictionaries may refer to the disorder caused by the sound of noise, it seems that in this case, noise and disorder are one. Where does this seemingly abstract relationship of sound and disorder come from? Charles Niggs(3) early twentieth century dictionary entries gives us an even more perplexing set of categories. 

WORD - DEFINITION
Noise - n - gulo, ingay, tunog

Ingay - n. - noise, carousal, revelry, romping, scuffle, racket

Gulo - n. - perplexity, confusion, disturbance, turmoil, tangle, chaos, chayos, discord, dissention, din, revolution, sedition, scrape, agitation, shindy, discomposure, disquietude, disquietness, entanglement, ado, pother
- a.- reverse- intricate, tangled, confused, chaotic

Tunog
- n. - sound, noise, report, clank, clang, ring, resonance.

First, Nigs defines noise by laying down three Filipino synonyms, ingay, gulo, and tunog. But are these three synonyms referring to noise the word, or to noise the phenomenon? Translating ingay back to English finds three categories of contexts, 1) the abstract concept of noise, 2) aurally intense social interaction, and 3) extreme and random natural or  man-made sound. Gulo, on the other hand,  cites all sorts of negative, offensive, undesirable, and unnatural social and physical conditions. Finally, tunog curiously includes not only the general concept of sound, but the seemingly specific noise, as well as a few onomatopoeic terms for what seems like the heck of it. This tangled web of synonyms confirm that in Filipino, as in English, ingay has its own inventory of abstract conceptual contexts. The existence of such contexts suggest that ingay, like noise emerges from a literal, designative mindset. 

It would be interesting to create an etymological timeline for terms related to noise because this would reveal the development of the words and concepts associated with noise/noise. What  can be concluded for now is that Filipino, having developed both a wealth of concepts and words for noise/noise, has  passed/is passing through periods of both orality and literacy.

THE HEGEMONY OF THE NEGATIVE, AND THE POSITIVE COUNTER-NARRATIVE
One of the most bothersome contextual variables of both noise and noise, is value. In spite of Western science’s relative neutrality, the bluntness of the Western environmentalist's definition of noise as " unwanted sound" sweepingly discredits the phenomenon and renders both the word and the concept indelibly negative. Most definitions point to noise as a phenomenon that is extreme in various ways such as bandwidth, loudness, interference, and order. Unlike silence, which is on the opposite end of the sound spectrum, noise and noise represent the undesirable extreme that results in damage, overload, chaos, and loss of communication. 

At one point, it seemed that the musical Avant-Garde movement took up the challenge to articulate the counter-narrative to tonal music by reminding people that noise is not always necessarily undesirable, just one of a myriad of sounds available to both musicians and listeners. The use of mechanical, and mechanical-sounding noises resulted in several decades of serious re-examination  of tonality. The emergence of Popular music, be it Rock, Pop or Dance styles provided an important critical mass to the idea that noise could actually be desirable. Lately, professional entertainment (e.g. professional sports) have given rise to noise not just as a product of performers, but as a vital feedback mechanism for the audience . These media-based,  contemporary forms have come to consider noise as an important canon. But while these positive operationalizations of noise may have become the norm in these specific contexts, what is surprising is that both noise and noise have not seem to have freed themselves from its negative connotation. 

It is tempting to reach into the bag of Marxist power-relation analysis to find the roots of the  negative concept of noise. The environmental lobby in the West is a powerful political entity that has changed the course of technology and infrastructure for about half a century.  As mentioned earlier, the bluntness of their attitude dooms noise as unwanted. This attitude is such a “matter of facet” that  there can be said to be a lack of genuine discourse about the value and application of noise. To make matters worse, as radical as environmental lobbyists are perceived, they are strangely aligned with conservative politics, and even critical theorists in denouncing even popular music, popular culture, and the noise that is so much a part of it. It is a strange situation when despite the seemingly hegemonic dominance of Western popular culture, it is in the West where the noise is still the subject of the most vigorous political control, regulation, and continuous assault. This  begs the question: which is the “real” grand and counter-narrative?

Popular art, after all, is viewed more as an industrial paradigm that is short on subjectivity  and long on objective formulas. This puts it well within the realm of the industrial revolution, which is widely held to have corrupted nature by controlling and eventually overwhelming it. But popular art is dynamic in the sense that while there are canonic formulas that have remained throughout the 20th century, it may also be characterized by unceasing change. So while environmentalist’s effort are largely to restore nature to pre- or early- industrial levels, popular art has constantly tried to reinvent itself and the environment around it. This makes incumbent popular art forces a mild but fully articulated form of counter-narrative because, however late, it still positions itself as a challenge to the past. Each new formulation of popular music, for example, represents the next higher level of spectacle, brightness, loudness, and noisiness. The incremental increase in loudness and noise levels for popular music performances and recordings may not seem apparent on a year-to-year basis. But when one compares the disparity between popular music of today with that just ten years ago, one will immediately notice a big difference. It should therefore be no surprise that each new generation of centrist politics would resist the challenge brought about by incumbent popular art and culture. 
Given this scenario, it should not also be surprising how noise/noise, despite its apparent application and affirmation by popular art, remains a concept and a word dogged by negative connotations. Will noise, or noise ever be able to shake its negative persona? If things continue as they do, the answer might be no, that is, in the West. The Philippines is another matter altogether. 

Referring again to dictionary entries, there does not seem to be an important distinction between noise as a force of nature versus noise as a result of technology in the Filipino language. This is unlike the West where nature and machine are engaged in constant battle, with man presiding over the proceedings. Noise  is never defined as something di-kanaisnais or nakakasama. Its value is never really questioned or challenged. And from the looks of things at present, it is not something people are not too keen on controlling. One possible reason for this situation brings us back to Ong. He states that oral cultures are “participatory rather than objectively distanced”. We can take this to mean that because people are participants in noise, it makes little sense to control noise unless one wants to control or deny himself. Participation in noise is quite different from either inflicting it on others, at or having others inflict it on you. The question of the noise as a meta- or counter- narrative in Filipino becomes moot therefore, because of the absence of control, infliction, and conflict. 

AFTERWORD
The exploration in this paper is by no means complete or even definitive. The use of dictionary entries is one source. But it has, however limited, already revealed some fundamental clues. It has suggested that orality and literacy may not only occur sequentially, but can overlap or happen simultaneously in a culture. Another discovery is that identifying  meta- and counter- narrative players, concepts and politics is not always as simple as it seems. Simple polarity is not always an accurate structure to use in such cases. There is even the odd chance that the meta- counter- narrative polarity does not even exist at all in some situations. These perplexing and intriguing discoveries are substance that will hopefully lead to a more comprehensive theory and concept of noise and noise, as well as ingay and inlay. 

FOOTNOTES
(1) Based on the report on Walter Ong’s “Orality and Literacy: Technologizing the Word” by Jennifer Marie C. Sunga, 8 February 2002. 
(2) Gaboy, Luciano Linsangan. Gabby’s Practical English-Filipino Dictionary. Quezon City: Milmar Soyuz Trading. 1999.
(3) Nigg, Charles. A Tagalog English and English Tagalog Dictionary. Manila: Imp.De Fajardo Y Comp., 1904.

05 February 2002

NOISE: A SURVEY OF DEFINITIONS, APPROACHES AND ISSUES

NOISE: A SURVEY OF DEFINITIONS, APPROACHES AND ISSUES
Robin Daniel Z. Rivera
5 February 2002
Sociology 297
Fr. Pablito M. Tagura

Noise is a phenomenon which has received a fair amount of attention from a wide range of disciplines. This paper will discuss, and present counter-arguments to these various definitions and approaches. The main approaches mentioned here represent the fields of epistomology, physical science, communication, environmental policy and art aesthetics. This is the first of a two-part essay, the second of which will deal with the theoretical foundations of each definition in greater detail. 

EPISTOMOLOGY: DESIGNATION VERSUS DESCRIPTION
A survey of english and filipino dictionaries find two categories of synonyms for noise. The first are designative terms for noise. This is prevalent in English language dictionaries. Truax (1999) presents the following epistimology of noise:
“Etymologically the word can be traced back to Old French (noyse) and to 11th century Provenççal (noysa, nosa, nausa), but its origin is uncertain. It has a variety of meanings and shadings of meaning, the most important of which are the following:
1. Unwanted sound: The Oxford English Dictionary contains references to noise as unwanted SOUND dating back as far as 1225. 
2. Unmusical sound: The 19th century physicist Hermann von Helmholtz employed the term 'noise' to describe sound composed of non-PERIODIC vibrations (e.g. the rustling of leaves), by comparison with musical sounds, which consist of periodic vibrations. Noise is still used in this sense in expressions such as BROAD BAND NOISE, GAUSSIAN NOISE, NARROW BAND NOISE, RANDOM NOISE, RUSTLE NOISE or WHITE NOISE.
3. Any loud sound: In general usage today, noise often refers to particularly loud sounds. In this sense a noise abatement by-law prohibits certain loud sounds or establishes their permissible limits in DECIBELs. See: JET PAUSE, LOUDNESS, NOISE POLLUTION, SOUND INTRUSION, SOUND POLLUTION.
4. Disturbance in any COMMUNICATION system: In electronics and engineering, noise refers to any disturbances which do not represent part of the SIGNAL, such as static on a telephone or 'snow' on a television screen. See: BACKGROUND NOISE, SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO. Compare: REDUNDANCY.
The most satisfactory definition of noise for general use is still 'unwanted sound'. This makes noise a subjective term: one person's music may be another's noise. But it also provides the opportunity for a society to come to a general agreement as to which sounds constitute unwanted intrusions.

It should be noted that each language preserves unique nuances of meaning for words representing noise. Thus in French one speaks of the bruit of a jet, but also the bruit of the birds or the bruit of the waves.”

The Filipino language presents another major category of terms associated with noise. These are descriptive, onomatopaeic terms Although ingay may be the common operative term for noise in all Filipino dictionaries, there are a host of onomatopeic terms used in its place. Kalansing, kalabog, ngasngas ngawngaw, kiyaw-kiyaw, ngakngak, pambubuliglig , pambubulabog, ingit, hugong, ugong, lagunlon, dalagdal, dalugdog, kalantong, kalantog are just a few examples of such  terms. The source of these kinds of sounds does not seem to be a major issue here, as either natural and mechanical objects and processes are capable of producing such sounds. This may suggest that Filipino takes a more descriptive, mimetic approach to noise.

NOISE IN THE POSITIVIST VIEW.
Physical science has long identified noise as a specific type of sound. In a nutshell, noise is a sound that has no discrete or discernable central pitch because it normally poseses so many pitches that a listener is unable to localize any specific one. It is often described as “aperiodic” in nature. John Eargle (1980) explains:  “The wave has no period, and thus is called aperiodic. Just as a complex repetitive wave form can be shown to be made up of harmonically related sine waves, noise can be shown to be composed of a continuous band of an unbounded number of sine waves.” This definition is relatively context-free, and relies on quantifiable physical characteristics to determine the categorization of noise as one form of sound. While empirical definitions like this may seem very neat and tidy, one may be nit-picky about the implications of such an description. 

Are aperiodicity and complexity necessarily the synonymous? And if a wave is repetitive, doesn’t that make it periodic?  Could it be that the production of noise is assumed to be aperiodic because there seems to be no apparent organization of spectral content? Could the perception of apreriodicity be born out of an inability of humans to reconstruct such aurally dense phenomenon into a logical form?

One could argue that it is possible to intentionally produce and control sounds that could be result as being noisy. Acoustic and electronic devices such as musical instruments and can be intentionally built and operated for that specific purpose. Electronic devices such as analog and digital oscillators, whose function and operation hinges on predictable, systematic control of electrical current are specially adept at producing “purer” forms of noise. How then can such controllable devices then be so good at producing a type of sound that is described as resulting from “unbound”  processes?

If the functional qualities of the source is not the locus of aperiodicity, is noise therefore a factor of the abilities of the receiver?  The absence of one's ability to decipher an unknown sound, and consider it noise until one acquires the familiarity needed to deal with it, leaves one to think that noise is a factor of an  aural training. But the counter-argument to this is that some sounds have come to be interpreted as indicators of specific environmental or social conditions. Thunder, rain and wind may indicate disturbances in the atmosphere. Crowd noise may indicate specific forms of collective action. That some sounds may be identifiable and yet remain physically qualified to be called noise  questions familiarity in the receiver as a clear criterion for the categorization of noise. 

NOISE AS INTERFERENCE
The information theory is touted as one of the earliest theories on communication. Its development coincided with the concept of cybernetics, which seeks to find similarities and relationships between the functioning of machines and humans. In many cases, the theory creates methods of quantifying not only the transmission of information, but message content as well. It cites noise as any extraneous element that obscures the original signal in a communication event. Any addition, subtraction or deviation from the original content is deemed as an effect of the existence of noise in the circuit. 

Given this formula, noise cannot exist as part of an “original” signal.  This implies that the purity of the original signal is ideal, and that noise should be either minimized for efficient transmission of information to occur, or redundancy must be invoked to overcome information masked by the noise. But can noise become the original signal?  Rock music, for example intentionally uses noisy sounds to intensify expression. Some recordings even carry the recommendation to playback the recording as loud as possible to create even more noise and distortion to add to that which is already contained in the recording. In this case, noise is no longer interference, but information. The theory works around this problem by saying that, indeed noise may become information, albeit spurious. The job of separating original and spurious information ultimately becomes the job of the receiver. So noise may never be part of an original signal, but it can become information.

The information theory (and cybernetics, for that matter) is not clear on the role culture, context and content. Because of its highly empical and "grand" theoretical nature, information is measured as value- free units. Its only reference to psyco-sociological issues lies in the definition of information as that which resolves uncertainty. If culture, for example in the form of collective selective perception, effects a modification of an original signal, then it would defninitely fall under the category of noise. But lumping noise  with culture as a threat to a utopian ideal of communication clarity is rather difficult to swallow.

NOISE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
The most common definition for noise is that it is unwanted sound (Suter, 1991). Environmentalists focused almost entirely on this aspect of the definition, and have been known to describe noise as anything that annoys people, disrupts their activities, or is counter-productive. Truax (1999) posits this as most prevalent among many definitions:

“The most satisfactory definition of noise for general use is still 'unwanted sound'. This makes noise a subjective term: one person's music may be another's noise. But it also provides the opportunity for a society to come to a general agreement as to which sounds constitute unwanted intrusions.”
While Truax suggests this definition is a reasonable compromise between various definitions, it is this very subjectivity that may cause disagreement among the various approaches to noise. Non-uniformity notwithstanding, one major target of environmentalist (and in the case of Truax, acoustic ecologists) efforts has been the proliferation of  mechanical noise brought about by the industrial revolution. Since the mid- twentieth century, government and non-governmental organizations in the west have had relative success in advocating for the regulation of mechanical noise levels in the workplace and the environment. This has resulted in legislation recommending noise level ceilings in public environments, and maximum daily noise exposure levels in industrial workplaces. For example, aircraft technology has been forced to develop along the lines of reducing operating noise in order to relieve residents in the vicinity of airports from such phenomenon as engine roar and sonic boom.

But while these developments have made incremental reductions in mechanical noise levels, there still exists a grey area in what constitutes noise. One of the major arguments against this approach is the selective application of criterion on what may be considered unwanted or annoying depending on the environment. For example, indoor recreational activities remain largely unregulated. Sporting events value crowd noise as an indication of excitement and audience involvement. Some stadiums intentionally put sound measuring devices to encourage fans to make as much noise as possible to indicate encouragement for resident athletes. Athlete reactions to this vary widely. Some are indeed inspired to better performance, while others develop coping mecahnisms to selectively block out noise in order to concentrate. The noise levels may often exceed regulations, making it seem apparent that such are exempt from workplace-related laws. This is similar to popular music-related events. While open air concerts must comply with environmental and zonal restrictions, indoor performances are often allowed to exceed maximum recommended levels. Because of this, many audiologists have expressed concern over the long-term effects of such exposure among musicians. Another example lies in the criteria used for environmental impact assessments for land-use  conversion here in the Philippines. The only projections made for the change of the sound environment before, during, and after construction is for level and duration. Other sound characteristics such as timbre, phase and pitch are not included. This renders the criteria not only subjective but incomplete as well.

This approach ironically uses subjective criteria for categorizing sounds as noise, but uses highly empirical but incomplete measurements for determining the quality of sounds in these categories . Because of this, it potentially ignores many culture-bound and context-sensitive elements that may contribute to the disruption of the sonic environment not just by noise, but other types of sound as well.

NOISE IN MUSIC: THE INS AND OUTS
There is a rich discourse on aesthetic approaches to noise specially in music. Much of this  emerged during the twentieth century, and coincided with various art movements such as futurism, the avant-garde, dadaism, and the like. This is generally marked as a period in which such musical movements were exploring possibilities beyond tonality. 

In his 1913 futurist manifesto (from "The Art of Noises"), Luigi Rusollo batted for the inclusion of noise as a main sound element of a new art form, which would later come to be referred to as "noise music". He begins by tracing the evolution of sounds from silence, to what he considers noise. "Ancient life was all silence. In the nineteenth century, with the invention of the machine, Noise was born." He goes on to say that sound was a thing that emerged as a separate, sacred concept as opposed to silence, and that music developed as a "fantastic world superimposed on a real one." Further down the evolutionary path, noise entered the picture together with the development of machines. He defines noise as that which "can be differentiated from sound only in so far as the vibrations which produce it are confused and irregular, both in time and intensity".

Noise, therefore, is something separate from both silence AND sound. Tones (which may refer to sounds with a dominant pitch)  receive only passing attention in this exposition, and may be inferred to be a separate entity in itself. These four things (music, tones, noise and silence), however, are only operationalized within the realm of music. Russolo concludes that musicians should expand the boundaries of music to not only include noise in art, but to develop forms that focuses almost exclusively on the use of noise. 

It is very tempting to argue that Rusollo's framework is rather naive about the stages of the evolution of sounds. His contention that earlier civilizations were only preoccupied with gentleness and tonal purity overlooks the possibility that music has also had an aggressive side. It also mistakenly assumes that machines are not capable of the "purity", and are boxed into a stereotype marked by brutality. He does however predict that machines will eventually be "attuned", something which has, in some cases, come to pass with the development of technology that is both mimetic and/or complimentary to nature. In spite of these, and other shortcomings, Rusollo's effort to renew the perception of noise in the context of art occupies a revolutionary phase in music history, and has had a profound effect on even the most mainstream of today's popular music. 

Unlike Rusollo, Douglas Kahn (2002) takes a separate path by suggesting the promotion of "phonographic" art. This presents the possibility of noise art developing independently of music. Kahn decries its retardation in comparison to "photographic" art due to the lack of the development of aural mimetic art forms. But mimetic sound art forms had to wait for the emergence of the avant-garde (represented by Edgard Varese and John Cage among others) before the dominance of tonal music would meet any serious challenge. And this only happened in the twentieth century. This, once again, clearly illustrates the severity of the isolation of noise from other aural arts before the twentieth century.

Paul Hegarty (2001) suggests a complimentary theoretical line by posing a dialectic argument that states noise is a "function of 'not-noise', itself a function of not being noise.
" He goes on to say that (in a Derida-inspired argument) "noise operates as a function of differance. If this term is what indicates and is subsequently elided, in/as the play of inside and outside (of meaning, thruth language, culture...), then we can form another binary with identity on the one side and differance on the other, but with this difference - that differance is both one term in the binary, and that which is the operation of the binary." 

He also quotes Kahn who states that noise "drifts" between empriricism and abstraction. Hegarty’s article focuses mainly on a contemporary form known as “Japanese Noise Music” and cites the work of Japanese artist Masami Akita (a.k.a Merzbow) as a classic example of such music.
Ironically, it is Akita himself who denies Rusollo and Hegarty’s contention that noise is a discrete entity from sound. In an interview with Billy Bob Hargus (December 1997), he reiterates his stand that noise is just another material used in musical composition:
“Q: How do you see noise? is it a building block?
A: I think of it as colorful inks of an illustrator.
Q: Your use of ambient material- drills, jack hammers, crashes- how does this compare to use of electronic sounds?
A: There's no comparison. I don't think it's very different because it's all just sound material. They're the same materials to me. I use all kinds of different sounds for my work. I'm using actual sounds, just recording sounds then altering it electronic devices. So then it's not very different.
Q: With your use of tapes, are you appropriating, recontextualizing?
A: Tapes are just raw materials to use. When I'm using tapes, I'm just using it as music equipment. I'm always thinking like I'm mixing. Of course, I want to change the original source to something else. 
Q: What led to your use of vocals on Noise Embryo? Do you plan to use more vocals in the future with your work?
A: No reason for use my voice on Noise Embryo. The voice was always meant a part of sound. I've never used vocals for singing- it's just another instrument. I just used it as sound, not really vocals.”

In another interview (2002), Akita states:
“Q: One of the other noisicans I interviewed in the past stated that 'noise' is not really a genre of music, but a separate entity by itself - just because something is released as a CD doesn't make it music. Do you agree with that? What is the connection (if any) between 'noise' and 'music'?
A: There is no difference between Noise and Music in my work. I have no idea what you term "Music" and "Noise". It's different depending on each person. If "Noise" means uncomfortable sound, then pop music is noise to me.”
Akita’s views seem to loop back to the positivist definition of sound as a specific type of sound material among others available to musicians, but recognizes the subjective criteria that is often used to categorize it. 

CONCLUSIONS
The rich variety of definitions of noise presents not only a bi-polar scenario (as in a binary), but a multi-dimensional, “circus-like” arena of both contending and complimentary views. One can expect potentially the same situation that occurs in the context of language, as each approach follows a major philosophical paradigm. As mentioned earlier, a subsequent paper will explore in greater detail the  theoretical foundations of each approach. 

REFERENCES

Books

Everest, Alton. The Master Handbook of Acoustics, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill Professional Book Group, 2000

Lucky, Robert W. Silicon Dreams: Information, Man and Machine. New York. St. Martins Press, 1989.

Severin, Werner J., Tankard, James W. Jr. Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, Uses. New York: Hastings House, 1979.

Suter, Alice H. Noise and Its Effects. 1991. < http://www.nonoise.org/library/suter/suter.htm >  (20 June 2001

Truax, Barry. Acoustic Communication, 2nd edition. Westport, Connecticut: Ablex Publishing, 2001. 


Electronic Documents

Hegarty, Paul. Full With Noise: Theory and Japanese Noise Music (19 November 2001 / 7:08 AM PST).

Truax, Barry. Handbook of Acoustic Ecology, 2nd edition. CD-ROM version 1.1.  Cambridge Street Publishing, 1999.. 

______. Interview with Masami Akita. (30 January 2002, 1:06am PST)

_____. MERZBOW:Interview by Billy Bob Hargus, December 1997 (30 January 2002, 1:05am PST)


Unpublished Sources

Landco - NE Development Corp. Environmental Impact Statement: Proposed Lakewood Golf and Country Club. November 1996. 

_____ . Initial Environmental Examination for the Proposed Happy Homes Subdivision, Sitio Kulasisi, Baranggay San Luis, Antipolo, Rizal. 


Dictionaries

Commission of the Filipino Language. English-Tagalog Dictionary 3rd ed. Pasig, Metro Manila: Anvil Publishing, Inc., 1992.

English, Leo James. English-Tagalog Dictionary. Quezon City: Kalayaan Press Mktg. Ent.,Inc, 1989.

English, Leo James. Tagalog-English Dictionary. Quezon City: Kalayaan Press Mktg. Ent.,Inc, 1986.

Enriquez, M. Jacobo, Quimba, J. Ben. Pocket Dictionary: English-Tagalog-Ilokano Vocabulary. Manila: Philippine Book Company, 1968.

Gaboy, Luciano Linsangan. Gabby’s Practical English-Filipino Dictionary. Quezon City: Milmar Soyuz Trading. 1999.

Institute of National Language, An English-Tagalog Dictionary. Manila: Institute of National Language, 1960.

Instructional Materials Corporation-Institute of National Language. INL-IMC Dictionary (English Filipino. Quezon City: Institute of National Language, 1987.

Manser, Martin H., Angeles, Epifania G. The New Standard English-Filipino Dictionary. Makati: Belgosa Media Systems Inc., 1984.

Nigg, Charles. A Tagalog English and English Tagalog Dictionary. Manila: Imp.De Fajardo Y Comp., 1904.

Panganiban, Jose Villa. Diksunaryo Tesauro Pilipino Ingles: Proyektong Pangwika 1969-70-71, Abril 18 1971. Quezon City: Manlapaz Publishing Co., 1971.

Santos, Vito C., Santos, Luningning E. English-Filipino Dictionary. Pasig, Metro Manila: Anvil Publishing, 1995.